Back to Community
Do momentum and reversals coexist?

Many in academia have studied the predictability of stock returns along various cross-sections based on past returns. Some of these cross-sectional analyses dissect stock returns along time (returns patterns like momentum over the short and long term), industry (sector returns) among other dimensions.

Jason Wei of the University of Toronto proposes that momentum and reversals coexist. Here, momentum is understood to be the rate of acceleration of a security's price. Reversals are defined as changes in the direction of a price trend. Wei's research, detailed in the paper titled “Do momentum and reversals coexist?”, states that rather than assuming momentum and reversals as separate phenomena, the two occur simultaneously. Further, Wei also studies return predictability along the dimensions of size and volatility. Wei’s research documents that for large-cap/ low-volatility stocks, reversals prevail while large-cap/high-volatility stocks experience momentum.

Quantpedia concludes that this cannot be fully rationalized by either risk-based or behavioral-based explanations, with Wei adding that some behavioral-based models go the furthest in rationalizing the findings.

In order to study Wei’s findings, my notebook recreates the methodology using the Q1500 universe of stocks for a time period ranging from December 1, 2010 to December 1, 2016. When tuning and backtesting the corresponding algorithm, I noted a consistent decline or stagnation in performance from early 2015 to mid 2016. The reason for this is still unknown.

As my first exercise writing a notebook and conducting quantitative research, I’d love to receive feedback from the community. How can I heighten my researching skills? Thank you for reading and for your responses.

Loading notebook preview...
Notebook previews are currently unavailable.

The material on this website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation or endorsement for any security or strategy, nor does it constitute an offer to provide investment advisory services by Quantopian. In addition, the material offers no opinion with respect to the suitability of any security or specific investment. Quantopian makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the views expressed in the website. The views are subject to change, and may have become unreliable for various reasons, including changes in market conditions or economic circumstances. All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. You should consult with an investment professional before making any investment decisions.

3 responses

Attached is the backtest for the strategy described above.

Clone Algorithm
Backtest from to with initial capital
Total Returns
Max Drawdown
Benchmark Returns
Returns 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month
Alpha 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month
Beta 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month
Sharpe 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month
Sortino 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month
Volatility 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month
Max Drawdown 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month
# Backtest ID: 58b9d72cf9bcbc5e4b87660d
There was a runtime error.

Two things:

I don't see that the volatility factor uses the window length at all?

And second, it seems obvious that high momentum would cause high volatility, just mathematically. For this study to be useful, high volatility would have to predict high momentum; as such, someone should rerun the study by calculating the volatility for the 30 days prior to the momentum window and test that relationship.

Never mind the first point been away from it for too long.